When it comes to privacy protection in blockchain, many projects are not thorough enough. Most only focus on the transaction layer, hiding the sender or the amount to claim "strong privacy." But anyone who has dealt with financial services knows that such protection is far from sufficient.



Why is that? Because real-world financial operations are not that simple. A single transfer is just the surface; the real key lies in the contract logic and asset structure behind it. Merely securing transaction privacy is useless if the contracts and assets are fully public—sensitive information can still be extracted, just in a different way.

DUSK's approach is different. They don't just patch a single vulnerability; they extend privacy capabilities across three levels: transactions, contracts, and assets. Only then can they truly address complex financial scenarios.

Let's start with the transaction layer. This is the most basic part, handling fund flows and transaction details to prevent market behavior from being fully exposed. But financial operations often involve multiple transfers, and the key is executing complex logic through contracts. If all contracts are public, parameters, conditions, and intermediate states during execution—business secrets—will be leaked. Imagine securities trading or structured financial products—who would dare to make these public? Therefore, DUSK adds privacy support at the contract level as well, enabling the business logic itself to be confidential.

Next is the asset layer. In reality, financial assets never require full disclosure of holdings and transfer paths to everyone. Financial institutions follow principles of limited disclosure within compliance boundaries. DUSK uses a privacy-preserving asset model, allowing tokens and assets on-chain to operate without exposing their entire state at runtime. Meanwhile, the system can still verify legality and data consistency. The two are not mutually exclusive.

A key point here: three-layer privacy is not isolated. They share the same design logic, with transactions, contracts, and assets working collaboratively within the same privacy boundary. No information leaks due to layer separation. This integrated design essentially mimics how traditional finance manages information.

From this perspective, DUSK's competitiveness is not just "stronger privacy," but more comprehensive privacy coverage. It is this deep coverage that enables blockchain to truly meet the demands of complex financial operations. No longer just protecting the surface of transfers, but delving into every aspect of financial business.
DUSK-12.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 13h ago
Well... to put it simply, most privacy coins are just a facade. Finally, someone has clarified this issue; other projects really only focus on superficial tricks. This three-layer privacy logic is quite clever, but how many can actually be used in complex financial scenarios?
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapistvip
· 13h ago
Honestly, most projects are just hyping the concept of privacy without really thinking it through. The three-layer privacy logic is indeed on point, but the real question is whether DUSK can truly be implemented. Privacy at the contract layer? Sounds great, but how do you ensure performance? This idea is somewhat interesting; finally, someone has considered the complexity of finance. The three-layer privacy packaging is indeed more sophisticated than those projects that only hide transfers. Another one claiming to revolutionize traditional finance—let's wait and see the real data first. The overall privacy design sounds impressive, but the key is user experience and actual adoption rate. The three-layer privacy framework is quite comprehensive, but it feels like the technical difficulty has been underestimated.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTradervip
· 13h ago
ngl the three-layer privacy play here is lowkey genius for pumping institutional narrative... classic social arbitrage setup fr fr
Reply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 13h ago
Layer 3 privacy is indeed a valid point, but can the traditional financial concepts really be directly applied on the blockchain? --- Wow, contracts and assets also need privacy—this is truly the level of financial-grade security. --- Wait, can DUSK's design really achieve seamless interoperability? Or is it just wishful thinking again? --- That's right, just hiding the sender in a transfer is self-deception; sensitive information has long been exposed. --- The idea of connecting three layers of privacy is brilliant, but unfortunately most projects are still playing the old single-layer tricks. --- Asset layer privacy... isn't this just reinventing the auditing mechanisms of traditional finance? --- I just want to know how high the verification costs of this system are. Is the trade-off really worth it? --- Alright, at least it's more thoughtful than projects that only hide addresses, but has it been implemented, everyone? --- The term "holistic design" sounds good, but in actual operation, will it fall apart again? --- It's rare to see someone truly understand the complexity of finance. Thumbs up.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 13h ago
To be honest, the idea of these three layers of privacy really hits the key point, but can on-chain truly achieve the same level as traditional finance? That might be a different story altogether.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 14h ago
Good morning, night creatures. Basically, it's just moving the scene of the sandwich attack from one place to three places. It sounds great, but the real predators have long figured out the way. Multi-layer privacy is indeed beautiful, but the problem is that most people can't see through the tricks of the contract layer and instead think they are safe. This is the most deadly. Making privacy comprehensive just to make money from us—bold move. It's quite interesting, at least admitting that old chain privacy is a sieve. Talking about three-layer privacy collaboration sounding so good, I just want to ask a question: who verifies this black box? Isn't it still trust nodes? The overall design is indeed impressive, but there's a time cost issue that people always overlook— the higher the complexity, the greater the cost when vulnerabilities appear. Have you considered this?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)