2026-01-21 15:24:07

Regarding the Plasma chain, I’ve been monitoring the data and not getting caught up in those hype talks. Recently, a set of numbers caught my attention.

The total on-chain stablecoin market cap is about $1.94 billion, down 5.78% over the past seven days. USDT dominates, accounting for approximately 82.53%. This clearly indicates a phenomenon: people mainly use dollar assets, but the supply naturally fluctuates, so a snapshot at a certain moment shouldn’t be taken as a hard rule.

What’s truly worth examining is the fee design. The chain-level 24-hour transaction fees are only $256—essentially free. But at the application layer, 24-hour fees amount to about $284,400, with application layer revenue at $34,100. This comparison sends a clear signal to retail investors: Plasma minimizes friction for basic transfers and stacks profits on trading, lending, routing, and various services. Being user-friendly is good, but for token holders, the valuation logic needs to change. Don’t just focus on burning and chain fees—what really matters is the cash flow quality generated by the ecosystem services.

In terms of activity, the decentralized exchange’s 24-hour trading volume is about $31.33 million, with a seven-day total of approximately $291 million, a weekly increase of 41.7%. This isn’t some fake hype—indicating that on-chain funds are indeed circulating, liquidity is flowing, and fee income is real cash.

Looking at bridge interface capacity, the total asset size is about $7.155 billion, with third-party assets around $2.43 billion. For retail investors, this is like the capacity of the entry and exit channels—wider channels mean lower chances of being bottlenecked.

Let’s also look at the XPL token itself. The current price is about $0.12, with a circulating market cap of $254 million, and a fully diluted valuation of $1.228 billion.

Next, there’s a clear supply event to watch: on January 25, 2026, 88.89 million XPL tokens are expected to unlock, accounting for 4.33% of the released supply. I don’t see this as a prophecy of only rise or fall, but as a window that amplifies volatility. If you hold positions, plan ahead and think through the risks thoroughly.

XPL6,47%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

alpha_leaker

· 6h ago

Layer fees are only $256, but the ecosystem has eaten up $284,400. This disparity is quite stark. It seems Plasma is really using cheap transfers to siphon off value, making money solely through upper-layer applications cutting the leeks. Retail investors are still counting on the burn mechanism; they've long since moved their cash flow into DeFi. Wake up, the logic has changed. A 41.7% weekly increase is impressive, but I want to know how long this hype can last. The trading volume is real; the question is, who is actually trading? The wave of unlocks in January 2026, at 4.33%, doesn't seem like much, but when that day comes, small-cap tokens will be easily hammered through. Be prepared. XPL is now at 0.12, fully diluted to 1.228 billion, which makes this valuation a bit shaky. Early investors are in a better position; new entrants need to think clearly about where the returns are.

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 6h ago

ngl the 256 dollar daily fee is basically saying "we don't care about base layer revenue" which... back in my mining days that woulda been unthinkable lmao. but yeah the real money's in app layer, that's where the actual cash flow lives. this is why rollups matter fr

Reply0

MagicBean

· 6h ago

Fee design is indeed interesting. The application layer benefits from the chain layer, and retail investors need to think clearly about what they are betting on. XPL at this price level doesn't seem that outrageous, and the unlock in January 2026 is not a black swan; just plan ahead. Application layer revenue is real money, but it depends on whether it can be sustained... Chain fee of only $256? This strategy really aims to boost ecosystem activity. A 5.78% decline in stablecoins isn't a big deal; the concern is if there will be greater withdrawal pressure later on. DEX trading volume increased by 41.7% week-over-week, finally some real transactions. A chain without a burning mechanism needs to rethink its valuation logic. The focus on cash flow quality is spot on; it's more important than anything else. A bridging scale of 7.1 billion looks decent, at least the liquidity channels aren't completely blocked.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 6h ago

Haha, finally someone is not just talking nonsense and is directly analyzing the data. I like this kind of solid analysis. That difference between application layer costs and revenue, honestly, it's a bit painful... 280,000 in fees but only 34,000 in revenue? Where did that gap go? Is there a problem? I'm not worried about the stablecoin dropping 5.78%; this is normal fluctuation. The key point is that liquidity is indeed shifting. A 41.7% weekly increase is not a false figure; that's the highlight. $0.12? It feels like there’s still room to go down...

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 6h ago

Hey, the gap between application layer costs and revenue is so large, this logic is a bit crazy, indicating that the XPL valuation might be underestimated. --- Stablecoins account for 82%? Basically, the US dollar remains the strongest belief, and other currencies are just supporting roles. --- $256 in daily on-chain fees, which really means no fee at all. So where does the liquidity come from? Is it all relying on the application layer for sustenance? --- Unlocking 88.89 million in 2026? Planning ahead is essential; we can't wait until that day to react. --- A bridge scale of 7.15 billion looks impressive, but the real question is whether there is genuine demand; otherwise, it's just a virtual number. --- Trading volume increased by 41.7% this week? Well, whether it's real money or just vanity, we need to see if it can be sustained. --- I'm concerned about who is actually making money in the ecosystem; user experience is actually secondary. --- USDT being so concentrated poses a big risk; what if some volatility occurs... --- Application layer takes 34,100 from 280,000 in fees. Who set this profit-sharing logic? --- Now buying at $0.12 is still too expensive; let's wait and see if it can pull back.

View OriginalReply0

LeekCutter

· 6h ago

Hmm, the fee design is indeed interesting, the application layer is eating the meat while the blockchain layer is drinking the soup. --- No, earning only 34,000 with 280,000 in fees? That conversion rate needs optimization. --- The 7.1 billion bridge scale sounds impressive, but how much is actually flowing? --- $0.12, completely diluted, isn't as high as imagined. Let's see how the January unlock will impact. --- A 41.7% weekly increase, don't be fooled by this number, small caps are prone to volatility. --- Still, the same old advice: looking at cash flow is much more reliable than just watching burn rates. Too many projects are just fooling around with this. --- Chain fee of $256 equals no fee at all. Can this business model work? --- Stablecoins account for 82%, indicating the ecosystem still primarily uses U, with no distinctive token stickiness. --- In this cycle, Plasma's positioning is still a bit awkward, feeling lukewarm and unremarkable. --- Waiting to see the January 2026 unlock, it seems like a good reference point.

View OriginalReply0