2026-01-21 15:21:31

When it comes to the long-term layout of blockchain, many projects talk about their vision, but few truly put in the effort. Dusk has prioritized post-quantum secure signature schemes in its technical roadmap, which may seem aggressive but is actually a pragmatic move.

The core logic is not complicated: if we want to securely custody long-term financial assets like decades-long bonds in 2050, we must start addressing the cryptographic threats posed by quantum computing today. This is not hype, but an inevitable choice for forward-looking development.

Looking at it from another perspective, most infrastructure projects are solving immediate problems. But Dusk is different — it is thinking about security needs ten or even twenty years down the line. This "time-aware security" perspective is actually the best yardstick to distinguish true infrastructure builders from those just following trends. Investors and users should recognize this clearly.

DUSK0,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenToaster

· 1h ago

Most projects love to boast, but Dusk's recent actions truly have some substance. The threat of quantum computing has long been on the agenda; don't wait to be held hostage. This is what true long-termism looks like, not those who shout about visions but are actually just harvesting profits from newcomers.

View OriginalReply0

JustHodlIt

· 6h ago

Honestly, most projects are just making empty promises. Dusk's move is truly visionary, not just riding the hype. As for quantum decryption, you need to lay the groundwork now, or you'll regret it when something really happens in 2050. This is what I call infrastructure thinking, not those who are busy chasing short-term gains.

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian

· 6h ago

This is true engineering thinking, not the kind of PPT vision killer.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 6h ago

Nonsense, most projects haven't even solved their current problems and are still talking about things in 2050. It's really about who is actually doing their homework and who is just talking nonsense. Dusk's move is indeed interesting, but it depends on whether it can truly be implemented later. Quantum computing, it feels a bit mythologized? Right now, the most important thing is whether we can survive until that time. So basically, it's about assessing the team's vision and execution ability—that's where the value lies. It's easy to talk about it, but how many can actually do it?

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 6h ago

To be honest, most projects are just making empty promises, but Dusk's move is quite ruthless. --- Quantum computing threats are already 2024, and some people still don't believe it. That's hilarious. --- Finally, there's a project thinking about 2050, not just following the trend of copying others every day. --- The priority of post-quantum signatures may seem pretentious, but it's actually very serious. --- Let's put it this way, only infrastructure that can be planned for twenty years is true infrastructure; others are just short-term arbitrage. --- Dusk's current move isn't about solving problems; it's about preventing issues before they happen, elevating the thinking to a different level. --- Compared to those projects that claim to be secure but are actually unprepared, Dusk really has something. --- I have to say, projects with long-term vision are indeed rare. Most are still just riding on this year's gains.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 6h ago

To be honest, most projects are just bragging, while projects like Dusk that genuinely put effort into quantum security seem especially important. Quantum threats are not a thing of tomorrow, but we can't wait until real problems arise to regret it. This is what infrastructure development looks like, not those who just shout slogans every day. Most people haven't yet realized the importance of this area, which might be the reason it is easily underestimated. Visionary investors should care about this.

View OriginalReply0