Using a general-purpose public chain to deploy stablecoins? That's already outdated. Plasma, as the first Layer1 network built from scratch specifically for stablecoins, has completely changed the game—USDT has become the native settlement asset on the chain, users can settle transactions directly with stablecoins, Gas fees can be paid directly with stablecoins, and in some transfer scenarios, there are no fees at all. This is not just simple feature stacking, but treating stablecoins as true currency.



On the technical level, it's even more interesting. Plasma introduces a Bitcoin-anchored security model, leveraging Bitcoin's decentralized computing power to vouch for the network's security. This design significantly enhances the network's resistance to censorship. For cross-border payment scenarios, it ensures both speed and stability.

In simple terms, Plasma is building a dedicated high-speed highway for the global stablecoin economy. As more and more payment scenarios rely on stablecoins, a public chain optimized for this purpose is no longer just an embellishment but a necessity.
BTC0.83%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotlinevip
· 7h ago
Hey, this time Plasma is really intense It's backed by Bitcoin and gas-free, feels like they're artificially creating demand? Stablecoins as native assets are indeed attractive, but it depends on whether the ecosystem can develop Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical. Why can't the general public chains meet these needs? If Plasma really takes off, you better get on board quickly Wait, can we elaborate on the Bitcoin pegging model? It sounds a bit vague I've heard this logic several times... the real test is still in adoption Payment scenarios come first, this idea is fine, it all depends on who can capture the market first
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 7h ago
Alright, stablecoin public chain, this time it's finally getting interesting. Pay gas directly with USDT? Really? That would save a lot of money. The Bitcoin-backed security model sounds impressive, but whether it actually works in practice remains to be seen. But on the other hand, if transfers could really be free, this thing might really take off.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodgervip
· 7h ago
Finally, someone is taking stablecoins seriously, this is exactly what I want to see --- Endorsing Bitcoin is brilliant, directly borrowing BTC's security to stabilize the market --- Paying Gas fees directly with stablecoins? Now you even save the trouble of swapping currencies, awesome --- Honestly, using stablecoins on general public chains is like trying to fit a foot into a shoe that doesn't fit; there should have been a dedicated chain tailored for it long ago --- Cross-border payments really need something like this, otherwise, you have to shuffle around for a long time each time --- The scenario of fee-free transfers sounds very attractive, but it depends on how it’s actually used --- The stablecoin economy has grown so large that a dedicated chain is indeed not redundant --- The idea of native settlement assets is awesome, it simplifies the entire process directly
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLadyvip
· 7h ago
okay so plasma finally doing what everyone said needed doing... native stablecoin settlement without the gas bleeding you dry, that's genuinely clever ngl. been watching gwei charts long enough to know this actually matters for real payment flows
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)