Why are institutions all targeting Dusk? One sente

Question

DataOnlooker · Accepted Answer

Incorporating compliance into the code is indeed a brilliant idea, but the key still depends on whether the real application scenarios can generate volume.

Institutions are currently testing the waters. Only when RWA truly explodes can DUSK prove itself.

The contradiction between privacy and compliance can be balanced, but it also depends on how the subsequent ecosystem develops.

The tokenomics design is good, and the staking demand is real. I'm just worried it might turn into another air coin story.

With this wave of opportunity, only those who survive until the end will know who the real winners are.

PumpDoctrine · Answer

Damn, compliance written into the code—this is true mechanism design, not just some theoretical compliance promises.

For RWA to really take off, it must rely on a dual approach of privacy + compliance. Dusk's approach definitely hits the right spot.

Why are institutions all coming in? It's not just because of the actual token economics; it's not an air project.

This round of privacy narrative has just begun, and it seems Dusk's opportunity is indeed underestimated.

Staking + transaction fee double circulation, a tightly closed loop—no wonder it can attract large capital.

Wait, can the SBA consensus really stabilize the network? I haven't heard of this mechanism before.

Integrating compliance into the code—basically, using technical means to replace the risk of manual review, which is really clever.

On-chain transfers of RWA require DUSK? If the transaction volume increases, doesn't the value of DUSK also need to go up?

ShortingEnthusiast · Answer

The idea of compliance codeification is indeed brilliant, but does Dusk really have a breakthrough opportunity through RWA? I’m not so sure.

Even if it’s written into code, it still needs to actually run successfully. We’re still in the early stages.

What is the annualized staking yield for DUSK again? Have you asked around?

When institutions come in, they expect stable cash flow. Can this expectation be maintained?

Aren’t privacy and compliance inherently contradictory? It looks suspicious.

If data visibility control is truly reliable, then financial institutions will really start to invest heavily.

To put it nicely, it’s a win-win; in reality, it still depends on who compromises more.

FallingLeaf · Answer

Incorporate compliance into the code? That idea is indeed brilliant. Finally, someone has combined privacy and KYC together.

I just want to ask, why are there still so many projects struggling despite RWA being so popular?

Staking and mining feel like they're back to the tactics of 2009.

GasWrangler · Answer

honestly the compliance-in-code angle is mathematically superior to whatever band-aid solutions most chains are shipping rn... but let's be real, if you actually analyze the transaction data, sba consensus is still sub-optimal compared to pure proof of stake from a gas efficiency standpoint

BearMarketNoodler · Answer

Achieving both compatibility and privacy at the same time—that's what institutional money truly desires. Other projects are still stuck with multiple choices, while Dusk provides the direct answer.

SchrodingerWallet · Answer

Wow, integrating compliance into the code is genius. Institutions finally don't have to worry anymore.

Why are institutions all targeting Dusk? One sentence: it has integrated compliance into the code.

Trending Topics

GateTradFi1gGoldGiveaway

SpotGoldHitsaNewHigh

GrowthPointsDrawRound16

TariffTensionsHitCryptoMarket

CryptoMarketPullback

Hot Gate Fun

ETH0

以太币0

马到成功

马到成功

嫣然天使

嫣然天使

🌞

🌞你仙人板板

嫣然

嫣然

Pin