2026-01-12 08:27:38

Recently, I discovered an interesting phenomenon: replying to entertainment jokes, mindless complaints, and gossip discussions can easily garner tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of views with just one post. In contrast, the content I post—whether serious analysis or casual chatting—consistently only gets a few hundred views. The gap is so large that it's a bit speechless.

I can't help but wonder, what is the underlying logic behind this? Is the algorithm really marking high-quality content as "non-hot"? Or is the distribution mechanism itself biased towards entertainment content? Users spend time sharing valuable insights, yet they don't get matching exposure opportunities. Is such a distribution mechanism truly fair?

This also explains why more and more people are starting to pay attention to decentralized social platforms—perhaps the traditional algorithm black box really needs to be broken.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LowCapGemHunter

· 2h ago

Algorithms are so pragmatic; feed your brain to the machine, and it only recognizes popularity, not quality. People just love entertainment. Who has the time for in-depth analysis? This isn't a black box problem; it's a human nature issue. Decentralized platforms sound great, but once you're there, traffic still favors the wealthy. Without good algorithms, it only becomes more competitive. This phenomenon has long been no secret. Why are people still hoping for change? Entertainment content is inherently viral. If you want traffic, you have to compromise. I think the problem isn't the algorithm but that everyone only wants fast-food content. Actually, it's quite clear when you think about it: platforms survive on advertising, and high-quality content actually makes people sit down and think. No wonder everyone is rushing to the crypto world; at least over there, people gather to make money.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 5h ago

Algorithms are just so realistic; those who can curse will always have a louder voice than those who can think.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 5h ago

You can't beat the traffic password algorithm is just so realistic --- What are those who make tens of thousands? Why are you still hesitating --- Basically, it's human nature. No one wants to see serious stuff --- Isn't this just another reason for the Web3 savior theory? Haha --- I feel the same way. It’s so frustrating --- Quality content? Sorry, the algorithm doesn’t buy that --- Can decentralization solve it? I doubt it, haha --- Entertainment is the real winner. Just admit defeat --- Late-night realization: In the attention economy, no one cares how right you are --- So I’ve started posting jokes too. Anyway, it’s all the same --- The algorithm black box definitely needs to be broken, but breaking it won’t change anything --- That’s why I only read gossip and not in-depth analysis --- Traditional platforms are essentially entertainment factories. Don’t expect fairness

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 5h ago

Algorithms are just designed to make you spam garbage, what can we do about it? --- That's why I'm exploring social on the blockchain. Traditional platforms are really hopeless. --- What are all these posts with hundreds of thousands of views? I'm speechless too. --- When I focus on quality, I get no traffic. It shows the platform doesn't care about quality at all. --- Decentralization is the way out, otherwise you'll always be controlled by the algorithm daddy. --- Wait, are you saying that the most liked content is all entertainment gossip? Then I need to change my strategy. --- The black box distribution mechanism should have been dismantled long ago. Web3 social is here to save the day. --- The more I think about it, the angrier I get. My analytical posts aren't even as popular as gossip and jokes. --- No wonder everyone is starting to migrate to the blockchain. Centralization is truly decayed. --- So, it all comes down to decentralization to break this deadlock.

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 5h ago

Bro, what you just said is my true feelings. Every day I see those crooked and ugly things flooding the screen, but no one watches the in-depth content. That's just how the algorithm is. Honestly, it's the lazy economy—more people are mentally exhausted. Decentralization doesn't necessarily solve the problem; it still depends on the community’s self-discipline. To be honest, sometimes I just want to casually slack off, why bother? Is it the user's taste or the platform's fault? It's a chicken-and-egg problem. Compared to fairness or unfairness, I care more about when I can make money haha. But your observation really hits home; centralized platforms are just like that.

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 5h ago

Algorithms are just so realistic; entertainment always wins. These days, who still has the mood to watch in-depth content? Scrolling through light novels is the true way. Honestly, high-quality content on traditional platforms is doomed to be crushed. Web3 social definitely has potential; decentralization is at least a bit more transparent. Instead of complaining about the situation, better to take a gamble on the new platform over there in Layer2.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 6h ago

It's all the algorithm's fault. I just say it's nothing more than a content feed farm. Entertainment content is naturally easy to get hooked on, and algorithms just go along with that. High-quality content? No one cares at all. Web3 social is right—decentralization is the way out. Otherwise, we’ll just keep being fed crap. That's why more and more people are moving onto chains. Anyway, centralized platforms are just traffic harvesting machines. Honestly, algorithms don't even deserve to be called distribution; they're just casinos. Funny jokes go viral, but quality analysis gets buried. This logic itself is ridiculous. Someone should have shattered this black box long ago. Blockchain social is at least much more transparent.

View OriginalReply0