This type of incident indeed warrants our vigilance. We understand the experiences of the individuals involved, but from the platform's perspective, KYC verification and security management are non-negotiable bottom lines — every platform has its own compliance standards and risk control principles.



The key issue here is: once it is discovered that an account has used purchased KYC information, even if the association is later解除, the system will still mark it as false certification. This creates hidden risks.

Looking at it from another angle, registering an account with unknown KYC data fundamentally violates the platform's agreement. When the platform detects such behavior and takes action, it is actually protecting the ecosystem's security — preventing risks like money laundering and fraud from entering the system.

A straightforward advice for ordinary users: use real identity information to complete verification, and do not indulge in wishful thinking. The seemingly convenient "shortcut" often ends up being counterproductive. Security and compliance are the bottom lines that no platform will compromise on.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekMastervip
· 13h ago
Honestly, buying KYC is really not worth it; a moment of impulsiveness can lead to heavy losses in the end. When it comes to playing with coins, you should be honest and straightforward. The platform isn't making things difficult for you; it's protecting the market. Just use real information, there's no need for all the complicated tricks. The more of these crash cases you see, the more you'll understand.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperervip
· 13h ago
Basically, buying KYC is just asking for trouble. Once the system detects it, there's no hope. The system marks it as permanently invalid, and no matter how much you try to fix it, that black mark can't be changed. Saving a little trouble temporarily is really not worth it. How can there still be people hoping to pass verification with fake identities? Isn't that just playing with fire against risk control? Is it really that hard to use real information? Why resort to crooked methods? By the time you're frozen, it'll be too late to regret.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 13h ago
Another big show of "shortcut backfire." Purchased KYC information is like a toxic address on the chain; once marked, it can never be cleaned—this is the cost of not doing due diligence.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 13h ago
Buying KYC information is basically shooting yourself in the foot; if the platform finds out and bans your account, it's not unfair.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMevip
· 13h ago
Basically, don't try to take the crooked path. It's completely reasonable for exchanges to operate this way.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamervip
· 13h ago
Honestly, buying KYC is really outrageous. Who's to blame for digging your own hole?
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnightvip
· 13h ago
Honestly, this is just deserved. Using fake KYC and expecting to walk away unscathed—what are you thinking?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)