2026-01-12 08:26:24

Speaking of the application of AI large models in the financial sector, the changes over the past two years have been quite significant. From investment analysis to trading decisions, the entire industry is undergoing an upgrade — no longer relying solely on traditional indicators, but using smarter ways to understand the market.

Let's start with the macro level. AI large models can process hundreds of economic data sources at once, including not only official economic indicators but also alternative data such as satellite images and social media sentiment. What are the benefits of this? It provides a more three-dimensional and comprehensive economic picture. Coupled with predictive models built using deep learning techniques, the nonlinear relationships and dynamic changes among economic variables can be captured, naturally improving the accuracy and foresight of predictions.

At the micro level, AI is also shining in enterprise data mining. Through machine learning and natural language processing, models can quickly extract valuable information from multi-source data such as financial statements, annual reports, and industry news — revealing the true operational status of companies, profit performance, and potential risks, with comprehensive analysis. Interestingly, this system can also identify undervalued companies or those with growth potential in the market, uncovering some unique opportunities for investors.

In the field of quantitative trading, AI is even more dominant. Based on historical and real-time data, large models can automatically develop and optimize trading strategies. Deep learning algorithms enable the models to continuously learn market changes and self-adjust. More importantly, AI can perform real-time risk monitoring and respond quickly according to preset rules, which is crucial for the stable operation of quantitative systems.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 13h ago

Sounds good, but the real money is made by the group selling AI. Whether AI predictions are accurate depends mainly on what data you feed it. This argument is made every year, so why hasn't it saved me yet? No matter how fancy the words, at the end of the day, it's still a game of probabilities. Whether I believe it or not is what really matters. Quantitative weapons until a black swan event bankrupts all models.

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 13h ago

Listening to this, it feels like all just on paper—can you really make money with actual operations? --- AI consumes all online data, but what about public opinion manipulation? Who's in charge? --- Predicting and risk control, yet some accounts still get blown up haha. --- Talking so confidently, why haven't we seen a few stable profitable quantitative funds? --- Satellite imagery sentiment data? What kind of outrageous stuff is this? Is there empirical evidence? --- Micro and macro factors are all controlled by AI, what are retail investors even playing at? --- It just seems like a new trick for big companies to harvest retail investors, same old story with a different flavor. --- Capturing nonlinear relationships sounds very professional, but it’s a bit mysterious indeed. --- Quickly extracting valuable information—has this been applied? Why is the market still so inefficient? --- Real-time risk control responses—what happened during those few flash crashes in 2020?

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 13h ago

Satellite imagery + social media sentiment modeling? I think this combo is promising, but the real money is still with those who master data cleaning. --- I don't quite trust AI predictions to be accurate; it mainly depends on who uses it and how. Technology is just a tool. --- Quantitative trading is indeed appealing. Automatic strategy optimization sounds great, but when faced with black swans, we're still vulnerable. --- I like the idea of finding undervalued stocks for a bargain; in reality, the areas scanned by AI have probably already been cleaned out. --- Self-adjusting deep learning? Sounds impressive, but in critical moments, manual intervention is still essential. --- Integrating various data sources is pretty impressive, but I'm worried about garbage in, garbage out. How can data quality be ensured? --- I trust real-time risk control much more than manual monitoring; it's far more reliable. --- The theory of AI finance is being hyped up, but the market is still largely manipulated by big players. --- Full coverage of macro and micro quantitative analysis—are we heading toward ending the era of human analysts?

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 14h ago

Satellite imagery and social media sentiment are indeed impressive, but the real money is still made by whoever first captures the benefits. Whether AI predictions are accurate or not mainly depends on data quality and the financial backing behind the models. Small investors and institutions are on completely different levels. Low-valuation companies with strong discovery capabilities are powerful, but the premise is that the market hasn't reacted yet. Once someone takes action first, prices soar. Thinking back to the market after the 2009 financial crisis, isn't AI quantitative trading just repeating history? No matter how good risk control is, systemic risk can't be avoided. All these can be self-adjusted, so what’s the point for retail investors? True competitive advantage lies in computing power and data.

View OriginalReply0