Recently, there has been a particularly confusing issue in the market that is worth clarifying.
Last week, the Federal Reserve launched the Reserve Management Purchase operation (RMP), and as a result, many people started speculating—"Is this QE coming back?" "Is the era of liquidity expansion reopening?"—but this logic is actually misguided. It must be stated plainly: these two are completely different things. Confusing them will lead to fatal biases in your market judgment.
How to understand this? An everyday analogy is the clearest. Imagine your residential community has a water reservoir. Due to high water usage and seasonal evaporation, the water level gradually drops. The property management notices this and decides to open the refill pipeline to keep the reservoir at a stable operating level. This refill operation—that's RMP. Its purpose is very specific: to maintain normal system flow and prevent supply shortages.
Conversely, what is QE? It’s like the community suddenly faces a severe water shortage crisis. The property management not only opens all pipelines but also calls in emergency water reserves and mobilizes social resources to respond. This is a non-standard crisis rescue measure.
The core difference lies here: RMP is a routine maintenance operation, while QE is an extraordinary emergency measure. The former aims to keep the interest rate market functioning smoothly, while the latter is a genuine economic stimulus policy. When you see the words "balance sheet expansion," it’s easy to get excited, but in reality, the concepts are confused. The purpose of policy implementation, scale, and market impact are completely different.
When trading and making judgments, never overlook this distinction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockTalk
· 9h ago
Huh? Someone else confused RMP and QE again, this logic is really incredible.
---
To be honest, I was confused at first, but I later understood that it's the difference between routine maintenance and emergency rescue, two completely different things.
---
People who get excited about expanding the balance sheet should calm down. The biggest risk in trading is concept misalignment, which can lead to heavy losses.
---
The analogy of the water reservoir is indeed vivid, but market reactions are not that simple.
---
RMP is about survival, QE is about liquidity injection. Mixing up these indicators is pointless.
---
It's really frustrating to have to clarify such basic knowledge, but I can also understand why so many people fall into traps.
---
The core message is—see through the true intention of policies clearly, and don't let the superficial words "balance sheet expansion" blind your judgment.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdrops
· 9h ago
Someone keeps mixing up RMP and QE again, I'm really speechless haha
People keep saying there's a flood coming, but actually they're just hydrating as usual.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 9h ago
Another bunch of people mixing up RMP and QE again, it's always like this, I'm really speechless.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 9h ago
Damn, someone is messing things up again. RMP is RMP, stop fantasizing about QE for no reason, okay?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 9h ago
Wow, someone is mistaking RMP for QE again. I'm really going to laugh at these people.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 9h ago
Alright, alright, another bunch of people confusing RMP and QE. This way of thinking really needs to change.
Basically, it's maintenance vs emergency rescue, they are not the same thing at all.
This time, we're probably going to get cut again haha.
I'm really speechless, only realize after the crash.
RMP is for daily maintenance, QE is the real liquidity injection. Mixing them up will be the end.
Trust me, don't be fooled by these details. Trading requires careful attention.
People who confuse concepts, get ready to be harvested, brother.
Property replenishment vs emergency rescue, can't you tell the difference?
Expanding the balance sheet by two words definitely makes people emotionally reactive. Stay calm, everyone.
This logic is full of holes, and there are a bunch of retail investors in the market.
RMP is just to maintain stability, don't overthink it, it's not that complicated.
Recently, there has been a particularly confusing issue in the market that is worth clarifying.
Last week, the Federal Reserve launched the Reserve Management Purchase operation (RMP), and as a result, many people started speculating—"Is this QE coming back?" "Is the era of liquidity expansion reopening?"—but this logic is actually misguided. It must be stated plainly: these two are completely different things. Confusing them will lead to fatal biases in your market judgment.
How to understand this? An everyday analogy is the clearest. Imagine your residential community has a water reservoir. Due to high water usage and seasonal evaporation, the water level gradually drops. The property management notices this and decides to open the refill pipeline to keep the reservoir at a stable operating level. This refill operation—that's RMP. Its purpose is very specific: to maintain normal system flow and prevent supply shortages.
Conversely, what is QE? It’s like the community suddenly faces a severe water shortage crisis. The property management not only opens all pipelines but also calls in emergency water reserves and mobilizes social resources to respond. This is a non-standard crisis rescue measure.
The core difference lies here: RMP is a routine maintenance operation, while QE is an extraordinary emergency measure. The former aims to keep the interest rate market functioning smoothly, while the latter is a genuine economic stimulus policy. When you see the words "balance sheet expansion," it’s easy to get excited, but in reality, the concepts are confused. The purpose of policy implementation, scale, and market impact are completely different.
When trading and making judgments, never overlook this distinction.