In the crypto space, compliance is often seen by entrepreneurs as a shackle—a troublesome burden that must be endured. But from another perspective, some treat it as a strategic game to be played.



Take a leading financial platform as an example; their approach is quite interesting. Instead of passively waiting for regulatory approval, they proactively design different "tactics" for compliance, truly connecting the global market into a single network. The core ideas can be summarized into three points: regional segmentation, focus on key areas, and setting benchmarks.

First, look at the high ground of financial regulation in the US and the EU. The rules here are the strictest, but also the most valuable. In the US, they align with the requirements of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, actively communicate with regulators, and strive for key licenses like Money Transfer License (MTL). On the EU side, they target the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). In these two markets, compliance is no longer just an entry ticket but a "common language" for dialogue with institutional investors and traditional financial institutions. Once recognized, labels like "EU MiCA compliant" or "US regulated" can serve as powerful brand endorsements, radiating influence to other markets.

Next are places like the UAE and Singapore, which have an open attitude toward fintech and aim to become global hubs. Their approach is different—deep collaboration and pilot innovation. Instead of simply applying existing rules, they work with local policymakers to explore solutions that embrace innovation while meeting risk control requirements.

The advantage of this layered strategy is that once a benchmark position is established in the US and EU, this "performance record" can be used to persuade regulators in other regions. Gradually, what once seemed like a burden—compliance—becomes the most powerful weapon for market expansion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BanklessAtHeartvip
· 4h ago
Compliance really depends on how individuals choose to play. Passive defense and active offense are worlds apart. Forget it, we still have to rely on the US and Europe as the main leverage. Singapore and the UAE are indeed trying new approaches, but in the end, it probably still depends on the US giving the nod. Feels like we're back to the old tricks again... dividing regions and setting benchmarks, honestly just finding a few "good daddy" regulators, right? This is the true survival rule of web3—building good relationships with the system.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 4h ago
honestly most founders are just playing checkers while these platforms are playing 4d chess with compliance... the real move is watching who gets the eu mca stamp first, that's when you know whose actually serious vs who's just shitposting about decentralization
Reply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 4h ago
Haha, using compliance as a weapon is indeed a ruthless tactic, but there are only a few who can truly master it. Turning shackles into a pass, I have to admit this idea is pretty clever. The US and Europe are definitely high grounds; once you get the label, you can radiate outward. Those in the know understand. Singapore and Dubai are indeed active, with openness on display. Honestly, you still need to take the initiative; being passive will only get you choked. This strategic layout has a bit of a chess player's feel.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)