Looking at the charts, I'm seeing $FKH potentially hitting $50M by early January. Parabolic expansions—do they actually work? That's the real question. Honestly, I think they do. But here's the thing: this isn't financial advice. Do your own research, run your own numbers, and don't just follow what someone's chart says. The numbers might look good on paper, but your risk tolerance and strategy are what matter.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetective
· 14h ago
A parabola sounds impressive, but it only counts if it can actually run out; anyone can draw theoretical data on paper.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 14h ago
Looking at the chart, I'm a bit confused. Can we really trust the figure of $50M? Parabolas always look good, but reality is what counts.
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCat
· 14h ago
Surface numbers are always deceptive; the key is to see how much you can actually lose.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 14h ago
The parabola looks beautiful, but what's really in the wallet... you need to first understand your own risk tolerance.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 14h ago
A parabola breaking out means it's over; the paper numbers are really unreliable.
Looking at the charts, I'm seeing $FKH potentially hitting $50M by early January. Parabolic expansions—do they actually work? That's the real question. Honestly, I think they do. But here's the thing: this isn't financial advice. Do your own research, run your own numbers, and don't just follow what someone's chart says. The numbers might look good on paper, but your risk tolerance and strategy are what matter.