IO is the native token of the io.net platform, and essentially, this project is doing one thing—integrating idle GPU resources worldwide. These GPUs are scattered across data centers, mining farms, and various corners, connected through a decentralized network to create a low-cost, high-efficiency computing power trading market.



Currently, the AI industry’s demand for GPU computing power is as hot as glowing iron, but traditional cloud service providers have prohibitively high costs, and supply often cannot keep up. io.net’s approach is straightforward—saving up to 90% of costs for ML startups and AI application providers while ensuring computing power can be deployed in seconds. This directly addresses market pain points.

From a trading perspective, it is recommended to focus on the $0.140-$0.160 buy-in range. Short-term targets are $0.28-$0.32 (conservatively expected to reach by 2025), mid-term targets are $0.48-$0.49 (anticipated levels in 2027-2028), and if the fundamentals continue to perform well, the long-term potential of $0.75-$1.00 is also worth looking forward to. Set stop-loss below $0.125.

Why are we optimistic about it? There are two main reasons. First, the demand for AI computing power is real and explosive. Without sufficient computing support, high-cost AI projects simply cannot survive, and io.net is targeting this essential sector. Second, the token itself has practical value—it can be used to pay for computing costs (and enjoy fee discounts), and it can also be staked for rewards. This dual economic incentive supports the token’s demand. Additionally, with a well-designed total supply that prevents infinite dilution, this economic model is fairly solid.
IO0.7%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HackerWhoCaresvip
· 6h ago
The logic behind IO is actually fine; it's just that betting on AI computing power is always lacking. I believe the 90% cost difference, and big cloud providers' pricing is indeed unscrupulous. I'm just worried it might turn out to be another Render story—once the hype dies down, it's all over.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 6h ago
0.14-0.16 Fuel injection range is the optimal launch window, RSI hasn't entered the near-earth orbit yet, and the lower band of the Bollinger Bands provides strong support.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeirvip
· 6h ago
It should be pointed out that this logical chain is full of flaws. 90% cost reduction? According to the data in the white paper, actually achieving 70-75% is already the ceiling. Don't be fooled by marketing hype.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictimvip
· 6h ago
Is the price of 0.14 really a good entry point? It feels like it's already been overhyped. But on the other hand, saving 90% of the costs is indeed incredible. With such high computing power demand, everyone has to pay the price. I'll try staking mining rewards. Anyway, I have free time.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)