🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Once upon a time, FLOW was extremely popular, and its high of $30 is now just a memory. Compared to CFX, where exactly does FLOW fall short? This is a question worth pondering.
Both times of risk crises involved frantic dumping. The project, once valued in the hundreds of billions, has fallen to this point, and some even say it might follow the same path as LUNA. The core issue is quite clear—there are very few public chains with real ecosystems, traffic, and self-sustaining operations.
Why can top ecosystems like BNB, SOL, ETH, and BASE operate steadily? The key isn’t platform subsidies or big initiatives like the BUILD plan. What do they rely on? The internal vitality of the ecosystem and genuine application scenarios.
CFX has never disappointed, and neither has ORDI. ZKC, NEAR, FET, MASK are the same. In contrast, projects that are just fleeting moments mostly die at this point: no matter how talented the technical team or how much funding they have, they ultimately cannot support real ecosystem traffic. The market always works this way—stories that seem solid suddenly turn into a fleeting dream. This time, we should all learn a lesson.