2025-12-28 01:23:58

FLOW recently plummeted 45%, which has left many holders feeling very disappointed.

This project mainly focuses on the NFT, gaming, and DeFi ecosystems. The technical indicators look good—using a PoS consensus mechanism, with a single-chain TPS exceeding 1000, making its performance quite competitive in the industry. However, no matter how strong the performance is, it cannot overcome one problem: a cliff in liquidity.

Market makers are gradually withdrawing, the bid-ask spread is widening, and retail investors are less willing to trade. This creates a vicious cycle. Industry insiders believe that projects lacking ecological support like this may face even more risks in 2026, as market funds tend to concentrate on top players. Without continuous development iterations and real application scenarios, relying solely on technical parameters won't get far.

FLOW-13.35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 8h ago

No matter how advanced the technology is, it can't save a coin with no users --- It's another liquidity crisis; we've seen this script played out too many times --- In simple terms, it's just lack of ecosystem and applications, all talk and no action --- 45% flash crash? We've seen it coming; market maker跑路 is a signal --- Top projects get the main meal, small coins are just sacrifices, 2026 will be even worse --- TPS breaking 1000 is useless, trading pairs are already cold --- That's why I only invest in projects with real-world scenarios --- If liquidity dies, the project dies too; even high consensus is useless --- Retail investors have long seen through it; no one is willing to take the risk --- Strong performance ≠ valuable; it needs to be used by people

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 8h ago

No matter how high the technical ceiling is, it won't sell, it's hilarious --- It's another liquidity problem, how deep does this pit need to be dug --- Great performance, so what? If no one uses it, it's just worthless paper --- Once market makers withdraw, retail investors become the last bagholders --- Still hoping to survive in 2026? First, improve the ecosystem --- Breaking 1000 TPS, so what? If transfers can't go through, that's the real tragedy --- Funds always flow to the top 3, others will have to reshuffle --- That's why I only invest in projects with real applications --- Once a liquidity cliff forms, it's game over, there's no turning back --- Poor FLOW holders, technical parameters no longer show any hope --- Ecosystem support is the lifeline; technical indicators are just good-looking appearances --- Another old project abandoned by the market --- It's time to wake up; chains without application scenarios will cool off sooner or later

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 8h ago

Oh no, another project with excellent technical data but a dead ecosystem. What’s the use of TPS exceeding a thousand when there's no liquidity? I knew it, these kinds of things are bound to fade sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 8h ago

Another project that relies on hype and parameters, wake up No matter how powerful the performance is, if no one uses it, it's useless That's why I only buy the top projects at the bottom

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 8h ago

Technical superiority over the crowd, liquidity just disappears when it wants to, quite ironic --- That's why I left early. I knew it was over the moment market makers retreated --- Another project with "performance ceiling, ecosystem floor," typical --- Still relying on TPS data to fool people in 2024? Come on --- Liquidity cliff is the easiest trap for NFT projects to fall into --- Waiting until 2026? I bet it will be even worse next year --- What PoS mechanism? Without application scenarios, it's just like waste paper --- Why do these kinds of projects just can't learn to build an ecosystem? I'm really exhausted --- The old trick of fooling retail investors, same old story, different packaging --- Top players get the meat, these projects can only drink the soup, and still can't get any

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 8h ago

What’s the use of good technical indicators if no one uses the ecosystem? --- Once again, a liquidity cliff—I've seen this trick too many times. --- Market makers running away means disaster; retail investors dare not take the risk. --- Having strong performance doesn't guarantee a promising future; when will we learn this lesson? --- 2026 might still see more dead projects being cleaned out. --- The era of fooling people with just parameters is over. --- Sigh, another project killed by liquidity drying up. --- Vampiric behavior from top players, small coins become sacrifices; might as well go all-in on Bitcoin. --- Once liquidity breaks, there's no turning back. --- NFTs, gaming, DeFi sound impressive, but in reality, no one is really playing.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 8h ago

No matter how powerful the performance is, it's useless without an ecosystem; it's just a paper tiger. --- It's the same old story of liquidity death; this time it's Flow's turn. --- Market makers leaving retail investors will only lead to more deaths, creating a vicious cycle. --- Projects that purely hype concepts will eventually fade away. --- A 45% flash crash—luckily, I had already exited early. --- No matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses it, it's worthless. --- Before 2026, these vapor projects should all return to reality. --- Flow just thinks that high TPS alone will turn things around? That's too naive. --- Once liquidity is cut off, no one will play; it's simple and brutal. --- I favor the top projects; everything else is just a trap for the little guys. --- Why are there still people holding positions in such projects? I really can't understand.

View OriginalReply0