Plenty of sectors survive solely on the back of arbitrary regulations. The narrative? Consumer protection. Reality? It's job preservation for regulators. The rulebook isn't built around what's actually safer—it's engineered to keep decision-makers essential. Meanwhile, innovation gets strangled by frameworks designed to protect institutions, not people.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractFreelancervip
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just regulators keeping their own jobs, and the consumer protection rhetoric is just for show.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 8h ago
ngl, the regulatory rhetoric is really just for their own job security, consumer protection? Uh... more like an institutional protection mechanism
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeErrorvip
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just a trick by regulatory authorities to protect themselves—consumer protection? Those are just smokescreens.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPCvip
· 8h ago
NGL, the regulators are just interest groups with a different name. I'm tired of the consumer protection rhetoric.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)