🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
#Solana生态发展 Seeing Toly proactively relinquish GitHub commit permissions is actually a very interesting signal. It’s not simply about "decentralization of authority," but rather that the entire ecosystem has truly matured to a stage where it no longer relies on the founder’s endorsement.
From a copy-trading perspective, this kind of shift towards decentralization at the infrastructure layer often indicates increased resilience of the ecosystem—risks are more dispersed, but it also significantly reduces the risk of single points of failure. Recently, I’ve been observing several skilled operators within the Solana ecosystem who excel at capturing ecosystem narratives. Their reaction speed and logic for adjusting positions in response to such events are worth paying close attention to.
This is not a matter of bullish or bearish sentiment, but whether "decentralized leadership" can truly translate into product competitiveness, which in turn determines the subsequent flow of funds. There may be short-term emotional fluctuations, but in the medium to long term, projects and teams that can continuously create value during the ecosystem’s self-organizing phase are the ones worth following.
The real test is not in declarations but in whether the ecosystem’s actual performance and developer activity can sustain growth over the next 3-6 months. This is the window to see who is truly getting things done.