Falcon Finance's technical roadmap has recently attracted a lot of attention. On the surface, features like the collateral engine supporting over 16 assets and the sUSDf yield generation mechanism are highlights. But to really understand it, the key point is how it evolves from a "product" into a "product factory."

Currently, Falcon is more like a black box—assets are input, yields are output, and how it operates in between? Users can't change that. But from a technical blueprint perspective, this system needs to be broken down and reassembled.

How exactly to modify it? Imagine the entire protocol being split into several plug-and-play components: independent collateral risk management, oracle gateways, yield strategy execution, liquidation logic… each piece has been tested in real-world scenarios.

What opportunities does this bring? Financial institutions can assemble these components like LEGO blocks—using Falcon's proven risk control modules, then integrating their own strategy tools to quickly customize products that meet internal requirements. Developers can even build entirely new solutions based on these components—for example, supply chain finance schemes tailored to specific industries. Falcon itself earns revenue through module invocation fees.

In simple terms, this is a shift from "selling products" to "selling capabilities." A seemingly subtle difference, but it can unleash entirely different ecological potential.