It's understandable for project teams to conduct witch detection, but what about the most basic transparency? Users who are deemed to be witch accounts should see clear reasons and evidence, isn't that reasonable?



Looking at it from another perspective, it's like buying something on an e-commerce platform, and the seller neither ships the product nor refunds, not even providing an explanation—who can accept that? Users participate with real costs, and at the very least, they should know where they crossed the line.

It's okay if they can't earn from fees, but such handling methods will only cause the ecosystem to lose trust. Transparent rules and clear feedback are beneficial for both the project and the users.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightTradervip
· 4h ago
That's right, this is a typical black box operation. Why is it that you say I am a witch and I am a witch, without even a clear reason? Isn't this just doing whatever you want?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggarvip
· 4h ago
Another one trying to shift blame? The project team constantly operates in secrecy, it feels like they're playing a black box game.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)