2025-12-27 16:27:02

ADICHAIN's tokenomics caught my attention lately. Let me break down what's behind $ADI:

Token Overview:
- Ticker: $ADI
- Total Supply: 999,999,999 (fixed cap)

What stands out is how the allocation is structured—this isn't designed for quick flips. The distribution model emphasizes sustainability:

**Community Fund - 35% of supply**
Released monthly in tranches over a 6-year period, ensuring consistent ecosystem development and community participation without sudden market flooding.

The fixed supply combined with gradual community fund releases suggests the project architects are thinking long-term alignment over pump-and-dump scenarios.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTregretter

· 32m ago

ngl This tokenomics design actually looks pretty solid... 6 years of linear release, at least not like some coins that dump immediately after listing The 35% community fund monthly phased release really can avoid the awkward situation of a large one-time dump But to be honest, I've heard the whole long-term alignment spiel too many times... The key is whether the subsequent ecosystem has real applications to support it Let's see if anyone actually uses it, and not another project that looks good on paper but has poor application

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 8h ago

Monthly releases over 6 years, I've seen this trick too many times. Can they really stick to it?

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 8h ago

Nah, this tokenomics design really has some substance... 35% community fund released gradually over 6 years. This guy truly wants to do something long-term.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 8h ago

ngl the 6-year vesting schedule screams either genuine or incredibly patient exit strategy... need to dig deeper into who actually controls those monthly releases tho. fixed supply is fine but that 35% community fund—where's it actually going? analyzed similar structures before, red flags detected when governance doesn't match the narrative

Reply0

SquidTeacher

· 8h ago

6 years of linear release, this is true long-termism, unlike some projects that dump their tokens immediately after launch.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 8h ago

Only releasing 35% after 6 years? That logic is interesting. --- Fixed supply + gradual release mechanism... finally seeing a project that genuinely wants to survive. --- This isn't a quick doubling design, I have to give credit for that. --- Releasing in batches every month, whether to avoid dumping or true long-termism, I need to see more. --- The number 999999999... feels a bit deliberate. --- Community fund of 35% over 6 years, quite thoughtful, but can it be executed properly? --- I dislike projects that dump tokens immediately upon launch; this approach is actually more clear-headed. --- Long-term locking + fixed supply, at least indicating the team isn't trying to make quick money.

View OriginalReply0