2025-12-27 16:25:31

I used to dismiss social engagement metrics in Web3—likes, replies, reposts felt like performative noise with zero substance underneath. Wallchain flipped that perspective for me. It's not chasing more engagement at all costs. Instead, it rethinks how attention gets measured in the first place. That's the real difference. When the measurement framework changes, everything else follows.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quiet_lurker

· 9h ago

Oh my God, finally someone said it, engagement metrics are really a joke.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 10h ago

Wait a moment, I need to think about your statement... I used to think that those engagement data were just fake, but Wallchain's new measurement framework logic really resonated with me.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 10h ago

A change in the measurement framework throws the world into chaos. I admit defeat; finally someone has broken through this layer of window paper.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 10h ago

When the measurement framework changes, the methods of harvesting profits change accordingly—that's the truth. Wallchain's approach, politely called "redefining attention," but when you look at the data flow on the chain, is it really that clean?

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPhobia

· 10h ago

Really, I used to think those data were all fake. But Wallchain's approach is different; it changes the very way of measurement. No wonder it can turn the tide.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor