What kind of competitive advantage has Maple built in the institutional-grade blockchain lending space? This question is worth a deep dive.



As the world's earliest and only truly scaled decentralized/low-collateralized institutional lending platform, Maple's position in this track is indeed extraordinary. The data for 2025 speaks for itself: TVL has increased by over 9 times, reaching $279 million, with active lending at $168 million. Products like SyrupUSDC/SyrupUSDT have become common choices for mainstream stablecoin investors.

Where does the competitiveness come from? First, look at the risk control system—this is the key to making the low-collateralization model work. Pool Delegates from traditional financial backgrounds are responsible for off-chain credit assessment and legal safeguards, providing a risk buffer for low-collateral loans; a mandatory Delegate staking mechanism ensures all participants share risks and align interests. This hybrid risk management architecture is rare among on-chain lending platforms.

Second is the innovation in token economics. After the MIP-019 proposal passed (voting on October 31, 2025, with 91% support), the protocol will allocate 100% of its revenue for $SYRUP buybacks and burns. Effective from November, this will be executed automatically every week, providing a clear and sustainable value capture pathway. The protocol's monthly revenue remains stable at the million-dollar level, corresponding to an annualized yield of 8-12%.

Finally, don't forget the business model itself—0%-30% collateralization loans, which shift the lending logic from over-collateralization to credit assessment, substantially driving the release of institutional lending demand. In both RWA and on-chain lending growth tracks, Maple is currently in a leading position.
SYRUP-1.32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkYouPayMevip
· 6h ago
Maple's move this time is indeed fierce. Low collateral + risk control + buyback and burn, after a series of combined tactics, no one can play as smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Sevenvip
· 6h ago
Low-collateral gameplay indeed brings traditional finance onto the blockchain. Poor risk control can lead to immediate explosion.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOnvip
· 6h ago
Low collateralization is really a big move; bringing traditional financial risk control onto the blockchain feels much more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 7h ago
Low-collateral mode sounds good, but the key is whether that pool of delegates is reliable. How can we ensure transparency in off-chain credit assessments?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)