When major brands make moves, there's often more to the story. One notable case involved a sportswear giant ending a high-profile partnership over controversial statements—yet the company's own history traces back to Nazi-era origins. It raises an interesting question: how do we weigh current ethical stands against historical context? The crypto and Web3 communities often grapple with similar nuances around accountability, corporate values, and the complicated past of many established institutions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 7h ago
This set of "moral judgment" logic is seen often in the crypto world, digging up historical dirt to whitewash current decisions... In the end, it's still double standards.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphetvip
· 7h ago
Uh... isn't this a typical "my morals are the highest" trick? Honestly, our Web3 circle isn't much better either.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelorvip
· 7h ago
That's outrageous. Can't even sit straight yourself, and you're still shamelessly blaming others?
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 8h ago
Honestly, this double standard phenomenon is very common in traditional companies, while the crypto space is actually more transparent.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)