🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Last year, some people criticized ETH at the beginning, which attracted countless E Guardians' attacks. Later, ETH continued to be weak and unresponsive, and gradually, the E Guardians started criticizing ETH themselves. ETH remains the same ETH, nothing has changed, only the price is not strong.
People in the crypto circle actually don't care much about how the projects are doing; what they care about most is the price. BTC is the last belief of crypto enthusiasts. All of BTC's concepts—electronic payments, replacing the dollar, government reserves—have any of them been realized?
I can understand why they are angry at others' criticism because cryptocurrencies are not backed by real assets; they rely on pyramid schemes. So, you say negative comments will affect the price of that coin.
For example, I am optimistic about Tesla. Would I get angry if someone criticizes Tesla? Tesla is backed by real assets—cars, FSD, autonomous driving, energy storage, robots. The progress of each project/product is reflected in its valuation in advance. Can who supports or criticizes influence that? The only thing affected is the degree of Tesla's product realization and commercialization.
If Elon Musk's FSD, autonomous driving, energy storage, and robots are all just hype, is Tesla still worth money?