🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Recently, I've been looking into some infrastructure projects that haven't been fully explored yet and have noticed an interesting phenomenon: the bottlenecks of many public chains are not at the performance ceiling, but rather stem from the initial choice of execution model being off track.
Some time ago, I revisited a Layer1 solution that focuses on native parallel execution, and this technical approach is quite clear. The V4 testnet has already gone live, but to be honest, the community's enthusiasm isn't very high, and there aren't many discussions.
From an investment research perspective, I am particularly interested in these points: Does the architecture design of the execution model truly fit the current application ecosystem? How much actual performance improvement does the native parallel execution scheme have compared to traditional sequential execution? Can the testnet data support the performance after mainnet deployment? These are all critical factors in determining whether it can truly become the cornerstone of the next round of infrastructure.