2025-12-26 14:22:54

After watching BEAT's trend for so long, the pattern of the whales is actually very clear—it's about repeatedly harvesting within the oscillation range.

The first round started with a position at 2.5, and seeing it rise to a profit of 1000U, I thought I could ride the wave, but in the end, I lost 3000U before exiting. That lesson was very deep.

Now, this round of the market is back. The peak reached 1400U, which seemed pretty good, but I still couldn't hold on and had to exit to preserve my capital. This has happened twice in a row—profits gained but not held, only to be pulled back to the starting point.

Carefully examining BEAT's current fundamentals, the momentum for growth is indeed waning. There are no new narratives to support it, nor any real application developments—just a repeated oscillation game. This kind of coin has long lost the possibility of a major market move.

Overall, after these two waves, there are gains and losses, but in total, I still made money. However, the lesson is—some coins no longer need to be involved. BEAT is one of them, and it's time to call it quits.

BEAT-0.69%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 5h ago

It's the same old trick, I've fallen for it before. The manipulators love to wash out and shake people repeatedly. When your mentality breaks, they cut everything. --- Having profits but not holding onto them, in plain words, it's greed. You need to know when to run. --- BEAT really has no story left; what's the point of playing a coin without narrative support? --- Breaking even and exiting is pretty good; at least you didn't lose money. Better than those lucky ones who held all the way to the bottom. --- It's high time to face reality; this coin has long lost its imagination. Cutting losses in time is the key. --- After two rounds of such tossing, the only gain is learning to admit defeat. Sometimes exiting is also winning. --- Repeatedly pulled back to the starting point, isn't this the favorite trick of the manipulators? Exit when it's time, don't wait for death. --- Without new support, it's purely relying on oscillations to harvest retail investors. I don't believe this can turn around.

View OriginalReply0

LightningAllInHero

· 5h ago

That's why you need to learn to cut losses. I saw through the BEAT trap a long time ago. --- The market maker just uses this trick, repeatedly cutting leeks, endless cycle. --- To put it simply, BEAT has no more story, so what's the point of playing? --- Two times with this rhythm... Bro, your experience is quite ruthless. --- Breaking even is already good, hurry up and go all-in on the next opportunity. --- No new narrative means a dead coin; exiting is the right move. --- Kept being pushed back to the starting point, if you don't wake up now, you'll sleep forever. --- I was also taught a lesson by BEAT, now it makes me feel uncomfortable just looking at it. --- This cutting method is old-fashioned; I don't believe anyone would fall for it again. --- But in the end, I still made a profit, much clearer than most people.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 5h ago

This strategy is indeed classic. Let me look at it from the data perspective—both rounds were cut within the same range, indicating that the market maker's liquidity trap setup is very standardized. The lack of new narratives is the key point here. Technically speaking, coins without fundamental support tend to have even larger fluctuations because there is no benchmark value anchoring, making it purely an emotional market. But honestly, being able to break even or even make a small profit in both rounds is already more rational than most people. Most are still waiting for the third round to turn around.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 6h ago

Both times you sold at the high point, indicating you've already seen through this game—the fate of retail investors is to be repeatedly educated by the distribution of chips.

View OriginalReply0