2025-12-26 12:45:23

Recently, I felt that the visual effects of my front-end projects made with Opus were a bit off-putting, so I decided to try the combination of Gemini 3 Pro and Three.js.

Honestly, the results exceeded expectations. Just a few rounds of Prompt tuning were enough to make the background effects of the Landing Page look highly textured—those details and layers are truly different. Even better, the entire 3D Logo creation process has been greatly simplified; there's no need to convert design drafts into 3D models beforehand. You can directly craft them in Three.js using code.

From interaction logic to visual presentation, this toolchain really works well together. If your project requires a more immersive visual experience, this approach is worth trying.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

just_another_wallet

· 8h ago

This combination is indeed powerful. Gemini paired with Three.js has taken off directly, much more comfortable than the Opus set. A few rounds of prompting can produce results? I feel like I'm still stuck in parameter tuning hell. Can a 3D logo be carved out like this? Then can I just throw away my design drafts?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTarotReader

· 8h ago

Sounds pretty good indeed, but Gemini has been a bit flaky lately. It used to work fine before, but now tweaking prompts feels like mysticism.

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 8h ago

Damn, the combination of Gemini 3 Pro and Three.js is really awesome. I also have to try it. Is Opus a bit lacking, or is it just that the prompt wasn't tuned properly? Three.js directly rendering 3D logos is really convenient, saving the hassle of using modeling tools. What library is used to render the background with such maximum effects, and how is the lighting handled? It feels like the next-generation frontend must know a bit of AI Prompt. Just a few rounds of tuning to generate the image, now that's productivity, brother. Is there a big difference between generating textures with code and traditional design drafts?

View OriginalReply0

ContractTearjerker

· 9h ago

Wow, Gemini 3 Pro really has something this time, more reliable than Opus Directly engraving a 3D Logo with code—something I never dared to imagine before The texture quality is top-notch, anyone who uses it knows This set of tools for 3D interaction is truly excellent Opus should have been replaced long ago, I even find it annoying to mention Wait, can Three.js combined with Gemini automatically optimize interaction logic, or does it need to be done manually? I've been testing for a week, and the immersion is definitely different, but debugging prompts are a bit annoying Once the Landing Page is up and running, it can never go back to the previous effect, really The collaboration between human and AI is at this level, and it's surprisingly smooth Anyway, the era of Opus might be coming to an end

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 9h ago

Opus really can't be pulled up, try switching to Gemini 3 for a direct takeoff. I need to keep an eye on this combination.

View OriginalReply0