Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

The recent ten-year bull run in the US stock market has reached a dangerous height.



First, let's look at the numbers—by September of this year, the ten-year rolling return of the S&P 500 has surged to 250.9%, matching the golden periods of the 1950s and from 1977 to 1987. What does this mean? Since 1930, it ranks fourth.

But don’t rush to cheer. There were two crazier times in history: the internet bubble from 1990 to 2000, which rose by 390.4%; and going further back, the "Roaring Twenties" from 1919 to 1928, which rose by 381.3%. How did those two end? You know.

The market is now divided into two camps. The bulls say: "It has only risen two and a half times, far from four times. The increases in the 1950s and 1980s were similar; didn’t they continue to rise afterwards?" The bears focus on valuation warnings: "Don’t just look at the price increase; look at the price-to-earnings ratio and the Shiller cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, which are already approaching the bubble levels of 1929 and 2000. Remember Black Monday in 1987? It also collapsed suddenly after a similar increase."

There is a detail worth noting from a technical perspective: if this year ends with a double-digit increase, it will be the sixth time in seven years—such a consecutive bull run has only occurred nine times in history.

In plain terms, this bull run has not yet reached the level of madness seen in the 1920s or 1990s, but valuations are already ringing alarm bells. Bulls believe the momentum is still there, while bears think a reversal could happen at any moment.

For ordinary investors, what they should focus on now is not betting on the top or chasing the rise, but closely monitoring two indicators: whether the valuation multiples continue to expand, and whether market sentiment has shifted from greed to hesitation. History tells us that the frenzy at the end of a bull run often comes suddenly and ends even more abruptly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 13h ago
It's this trap again; I'm tired of the narrative of history repeating itself, but the data is indeed frightening... 250% is approaching a bubble, and no one saw it coming in 1987 either.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeirvip
· 13h ago
It should be pointed out that this article precisely commits the common mistake of mainstream narratives – using historical analogies to scare retail investors. Based on the following arguments, I have to say a few truths: The bubbles bursting in 1929 and 2000 were not due to the rise itself, but rather because the fundamentals were completely disconnected. Although the US stock market is expensive now, corporate profits are not illusory. These are two different matters. History has never told us that "if it has risen too much, it should fall," but rather "a collapse occurs only when the fundamentals fail." Undoubtedly, overly simplifying to numerical comparisons is essentially the fiat mindset at work – always looking for a cycle theory to give oneself the courage to place bets. That said, what is truly worth being cautious about is not some valuation multiple, but liquidity. On-chain data has long been hinting at market trends; it’s just that most people cannot understand it. Instead of getting caught up in where the top is, it’s better to ask yourself: Does your psychological endurance match this wave of rise?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 13h ago
Ah, this... just looking at the bullish rise while pretending to sleep, valuation is the killer app.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)