🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
Musk's Energy Crisis Warning: The Self-Serving Alarmism We Didn't Need
I've been watching Musk's doom prophecies for years now, and honestly, I'm getting tired of his "the sky is falling" routine. At the Bosch Connected World conference in Berlin, he was at it again - this time predicting an energy apocalypse caused by AI and electric vehicles.
Sure, AI data centers gobble up electricity like there's no tomorrow. Some economist claims they'll consume what an entire country like the Netherlands uses annually by 2027. And yes, millions of EVs plugging in simultaneously isn't doing our aging power grids any favors.
But let's be real - isn't it convenient that the guy selling both AI solutions and electric cars is now positioning himself as the prophet who can save us from the very crisis his companies are helping create?
"We are on the brink of a crisis," he warns dramatically. How convenient that his solution involves massive investment in the same technologies his companies produce! Solar panels! Smart grids! Giant battery systems! It's almost like he has financial stakes in all those things!
Look, I'm not saying we don't face energy challenges. But this billionaire's self-serving "warnings" feel like marketing in disguise. He frames himself as some visionary savior while simultaneously profiting from both the problem and the proposed solutions.
What frustrates me most is how he glosses over the astronomical costs of his proposed revolution - "billions of dollars" is quite the understatement. Who pays for that? Not him and his billionaire friends, I'm sure.
The energy transition is complex and critical. But I'd prefer guidance from experts without skin in the game, not from someone who stands to make mountains of cash whether his prophecies come true or not.
His optimism about this "opportunity for innovation" would sound more genuine if his companies weren't positioned to cash in on the panic he's helping create.