In the world of Crypto Assets, an absurd drama is unfolding. On this stage, two protagonists stand out remarkably.

The first is a political figure of great influence. He sometimes drapes himself in the Stars and Stripes, loudly proclaiming his love for Bitcoin; at other times, he denounces it as a creation of the devil. Every time he speaks, it’s like thunder crashing, triggering violent fluctuations in the market. Investors are like startled birds, frantically adjusting their strategies. Interestingly, he seems unconcerned with the substantive content of his remarks, yet he can always make the entire market teeter on the brink.

Another figure is a charismatic leader in the tech industry. Social media is the wand he wields. His every move pulls the strings of the market. A late-night post of a cute dog photo can cause a certain digital currency to rise. A casual mention of his company's potential sale of Crypto Assets can send the entire market into a panic. Ironically, even though he holds a large amount of Bitcoin, a nonchalant comment can lead to the evaporation of billions of dollars in market value. Some supporters of Crypto Assets even have to ask him to speak less to avoid affecting the market.

All of this reveals the nature of the Crypto Assets market: it acts like a super-sensitive amplifier of emotions. These two influential figures, one relying on policy hints and the other on social media statements, can easily make this so-called 'decentralized' realm perform absurd acts of centralization.

This phenomenon highlights the contradictions in the Crypto Assets market. It was originally supposed to be an ideal decentralized realm, but at present, it seems more like a puppet theater manipulated by a few influential figures. This situation inevitably leads one to ponder: Has Crypto Assets truly realized its original decentralized philosophy? Perhaps, before this field truly matures, we still need to undergo more trials and reflections.