
An acquisition refers to a transaction in which a buyer gains control or key assets of a target entity. In Web3, acquisition targets extend beyond company equity to include tokens, protocol governance rights, code repositories, and teams.
Traditional finance acquisitions are typically settled in cash or stock, focusing on the transfer of equity and assets. In Web3, acquisitions encompass on-chain assets and governance, such as gaining influence through token swaps or integrating at the protocol level via DAO voting.
Acquisitions can be driven by the need to fill technological gaps, expand user bases, enter new regulatory jurisdictions, or optimize costs and cash flow. In Web3, an additional motive is to capture protocol network effects and developer communities.
During bullish market cycles, acquisitions tend to focus on scaling and extending product lines. In bearish or volatile periods, they often prioritize technology and talent, integrating resources at a lower cost. As of 2025, industry data shows that technology and talent acquisitions among small and mid-sized teams are increasingly frequent, with deals structured as mixed consideration (cash + tokens + vesting).
The principle behind acquisitions is the transfer of control and assets through value exchange. Control can take the form of company equity or protocol governance rights.
Equity path: The buyer acquires shares or assets of the target company, gaining voting and management rights. Token path: The buyer uses cash or proprietary tokens to exchange for target tokens at an agreed ratio, boosting voting power via governance proposals to steer protocol direction. DAO voting serves as the decision-making mechanism for decentralized organizations, where the community votes on-chain and executes smart contracts.
Step 1: Target Selection. Identify strategic needs (technology, users, licenses, geographic coverage) and preliminarily assess product and team fit.
Step 2: Due Diligence. Systematic review covering financials, legal compliance, technical security, and smart contract risks—verifying assets, liabilities, code quality, and potential vulnerabilities.
Step 3: Valuation & Pricing. Assess based on revenue, user retention, code quality, and community engagement; set valuation range and design consideration structure (cash, stock, token ratio).
Step 4: Deal Structuring. Choose between equity acquisition, asset purchase, or token swap; agree on vesting schedules (phased token release to reduce selling pressure), performance targets, and closing conditions.
Step 5: Compliance & Approval. Address legal requirements in the company’s jurisdiction; if protocol-level changes are involved, submit proposals for DAO voting; prepare regulatory filings and disclosures if necessary.
Step 6: Closing & Integration. Transfer assets and permissions; execute token contract migration and brand integration; set milestones and communication plans to manage community expectations.
Typical Web3 acquisition scenarios include: exchanges or wallets acquiring security tech teams; protocols acquiring front-end interfaces and infrastructure; companies acquiring compliance licenses and local operations teams.
On exchange platforms, acquisitions often involve token merges or migrations announced publicly. For example, Gate’s announcement section may notify users about token consolidation, trading suspensions or restarts, along with deposit/withdrawal and contract upgrade instructions for a secure transition.
Acquisitions affect tokens mainly through deal consideration, contract migrations, and brand integration. If a token swap is included, holders may face token replacement or proportional exchanges; protocol upgrades may require users to complete contract migration within a specified timeframe.
During announcement periods, trading and deposit/withdrawal functions may be temporarily suspended for security reasons. Users should monitor official updates and verify signature links to avoid phishing sites or fake airdrops, and follow platform guidelines for token swaps or vesting arrangements.
Valuation factors include user base size, revenue or TVL (total value locked), code quality, community activity, and regulatory risks. Web3 projects may lack stable cash flow; thus, valuation emphasizes technological barriers and network effects.
Deal consideration often adopts a “hybrid structure”: cash plus acquirer’s stock or tokens. Vesting is used to reduce short-term selling pressure—typically released in stages tied to performance or product milestones. By 2025, vesting and phased releases have become standard in protocol acquisitions to balance incentives with stability.
Risks include information asymmetry, poor code/key management, regulatory uncertainty, community opposition, and failed integration. If DAO voting lacks transparency or governance is dominated by whales, it may trigger forks or user attrition.
Fund security risks are critical: fake announcements and phishing links are common. During token migration, users should verify contract addresses and signatures via official platform channels; never share private keys or mnemonic phrases to avoid asset theft.
Acquisition focuses on the buyer obtaining control while the target may retain its legal entity or independent protocol status. In a merger (“M&A”), resources and brands combine into a single entity. In Web3, this can manifest as token consolidation, unified front-end/community channels, and governance concentrated under a new DAO structure.
In practice, many transactions involve both control transfer (acquisition) and operational integration (merger), so “M&A transaction” is more accurate—but “acquisition” often refers specifically to buyer-led control acquisition.
Acquisition is a strategic resource reallocation tool that extends in Web3 to tokens and protocol governance layers. Understanding both equity and token pathways—plus mastering due diligence and contract migration—is key to mitigating risk. Users should closely follow official announcements from platforms like Gate regarding token merges and migrations to complete swaps and risk management procedures step-by-step. For participants, realistic valuation, transparent governance, and patient integration planning determine whether an acquisition delivers lasting value.
It depends on the terms of the acquisition agreement. A full acquisition usually means the project team loses control as the acquirer takes over decision-making. Partial acquisitions or strategic investments may preserve some control. Project teams should clarify which rights remain—such as governance participation or brand usage—to avoid passive outcomes during negotiations.
Major platforms look for projects with unique technology, sizable user bases, and strong market potential. Boost appeal by consistently improving products, building an active community, and launching innovative features. Establishing a professional team with transparent financials and governance significantly increases attractiveness.
Token treatment depends on the acquisition agreement. Common outcomes include: tokens continue circulating; tokens are exchanged for acquirer’s tokens at a fixed ratio; tokens are gradually burned or migrated to new contracts. Token holders should monitor official announcements for specific handling plans and timelines to make informed decisions promptly.
Major causes include community opposition leading to compliance risks; valuation disagreements; technical integration challenges; market shifts triggering strategy changes; regulatory policy updates; and issues found during smart contract audits. Both sides should conduct thorough due diligence and allow for risk buffers.
Key steps include following official channels for updates; understanding token handling plans and timelines; evaluating the acquirer’s reputation and strength; remaining rational during periods of uncertainty; consulting legal or investment professionals if needed. Beware of fake acquisition claims—always verify official statements via trusted platforms like Gate.


