

When Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, he set a block size limit of one million bytes, which significantly restricted the number of transactions each block could record. Initially, this capacity met the needs of a niche market. However, as Bitcoin’s user base soared, network congestion quickly became a major issue.
Currently, the Bitcoin network generates a new block every ten minutes. Given the block size limit, each block typically processes only a few dozen transactions. Bitcoin averages about seven transactions per second. As a result, the blockchain can accumulate tens of thousands of pending transactions in certain scenarios, with transaction fees spiking to tens of dollars. During peak congestion, it can take several days for transactions to be confirmed.
SegWit (Segregated Witness) was introduced in 2015 by Bitcoin developer Pieter Wuille and fellow Bitcoin Core contributors to address transaction processing speed limitations. SegWit was activated in 2017 via a soft fork, boosting per-block data throughput by approximately 1.7 times. Leading cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash—implemented SegWit, resulting in expanded block capacity, faster transaction speeds, and improved network scalability.
SegWit’s mechanism divides each Bitcoin transaction into two components: core transaction data and witness data. The transaction data tracks account balances, while witness data verifies user identity.
For most users, the key concern is asset-related information, such as account balances. Details verifying user identity do not need to occupy significant transaction space. The recipient simply needs to confirm asset availability, not the sender’s specifics.
However, in Bitcoin’s structure, witness data—essentially digital signatures—consume substantial storage, slowing transfers and raising packaging costs. SegWit technology extracts witness data from the transaction itself and stores it separately, drastically accelerating transaction throughput. Signature data can account for as much as 65% of the space in a typical Bitcoin transaction block.
Analyzing Bitcoin SegWit versus Non-SegWit reveals foundational distinctions with direct implications for user experience. SegWit delivers several key improvements over the legacy approach.
First, SegWit unlocks much greater block capacity. By freeing the original block storage, SegWit enables more transaction data to be processed per block—one of the most significant differences between SegWit and Non-SegWit formats.
SegWit also substantially increases transaction throughput. Similar to Ethereum’s Layer 2 architecture, Bitcoin transactions are layered to accelerate processing. With SegWit, the system dedicates more computational resources and storage to transaction processing. Data shows that SegWit adoption lowers the average transaction cost to around $1, a dramatic reduction compared to legacy addresses.
Furthermore, SegWit supports the Lightning Network—the most discussed Layer 2 protocol for Bitcoin—designed to solve off-chain scalability. The Lightning Network builds a new network layer atop Bitcoin’s blockchain, establishing payment channels for swift, frictionless transactions even under heavy load. SegWit facilitates Lightning Network deployment, creating favorable conditions for its operation.
Another critical benefit highlighted in the SegWit vs Non-SegWit comparison is improved security. SegWit’s framework strictly separates transaction and signature data. Because user signatures are excluded from transaction processing, there is no risk of transaction data being tampered with or incorrect information being permanently recorded on-chain.
For everyday users, SegWit offers three primary advantages: heightened security over standard addresses, expandable block capacity and faster transaction validation, and lower fees compared to typical wallet addresses.
Bitcoin addresses now fall into four main categories. Legacy (P2PKH) addresses, beginning with "1," represent the original Bitcoin format and remain in use today. In the SegWit vs Non-SegWit context, this is the traditional "No SegWit" format. Nested (P2SH) addresses, starting with "3," are multi-signature addresses supporting advanced functions.
The two mainstream SegWit formats are: Nested SegWit (P2SH), with addresses starting with "3," compatible with Segregated Witness; and Native SegWit (Bech32), with addresses starting with "bc1," representing native SegWit addresses.
Bech32, standardized in BIP173 at the end of 2017, offers distinct advantages. It is case-insensitive, using only 0-9 and a-z, which reduces confusion and improves readability. Bech32 employs Base32 encoding rather than the traditional Base58, enhancing calculation efficiency. These addresses also improve security, provide superior checksum error detection, and help minimize invalid address risks.
In 2019, a Bech32 vulnerability was found: if an address ended with "P" and had one or more accidental "Q"s appended, it could still pass checksum verification. To address this, the Bech32m standard was introduced, adding an extra digit to the checksum formula. Bech32m applies exclusively to Taproot and future address types.
P2TR (Bech32m) addresses, starting with "bc1p," are Taproot addresses that support BTC NFTs and Ordinals NFT. Recent data confirms that SegWit adoption continues to increase, with most major exchanges and wallets now fully supporting SegWit addresses.
There are important, nuanced distinctions between address types, especially for Bitcoin SegWit vs Non-SegWit. SegWit-compatible addresses (starting with "3") save 24% on transfer fees compared to legacy addresses (starting with "1"). Native SegWit addresses (starting with "bc1") save 35% versus traditional addresses.
SegWit addresses (beginning with "bc1" and some "3") can reduce transfer fees by up to 70% compared to legacy multi-signature addresses (starting with "3"). Taproot addresses also support BTC NFT and Ordinals NFT, with fees similar to those for "3"-prefixed addresses.
These fee differences highlight how address selection significantly influences transaction costs. Migrating to SegWit addresses not only cuts expenses but also enhances network efficiency. When comparing SegWit and Non-SegWit, SegWit clearly delivers cost and performance advantages.
SegWit is a pivotal advancement for Bitcoin, raising the number of transactions processed per block. The technology resolves scalability constraints, addresses rare transaction malleability exploits, and expands Bitcoin’s programmability, enabling further scaling solutions like the Lightning Network.
SegWit’s successful rollout showcases the Bitcoin community’s ability to innovate and adapt to rising user demands while upholding decentralization and security. By separating witness data, SegWit optimizes block space, cuts transaction costs, and dramatically increases processing speeds.
SegWit’s benefits over Non-SegWit are clear: reduced transaction fees, higher throughput, greater security, and Layer 2 compatibility. Today, advanced wallets and major crypto platforms fully support Segregated Witness addresses for Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, as well as Taproot addresses for BRC-20 and BTC NFTs. This broad adoption validates SegWit’s role as a leading scalability solution, positioning Bitcoin for efficient, global growth and future demand.
Sending Bitcoin to a SegWit address will result in lower future transaction fees. Your wallet balance will gradually migrate to SegWit addresses. There are no compatibility problems when sending to SegWit addresses.
Yes. BTC SegWit is recommended because it lowers transaction fees and improves efficiency for self-custody holders. It is a valuable upgrade for effective Bitcoin management.
Bitcoin is the original cryptocurrency. SegWit is a protocol upgrade for Bitcoin that delivers lower transaction fees and enhanced scalability. SegWit is compatible only with wallets and exchanges that support it.
The optimal format is SegWit, starting with the number 3 and containing 26 to 36 characters. It is broadly supported by enterprises and wallets.











